Innovation Capacity
« Data & IndicatorsInnovation drives the knowledge economy. Innovation provides the competitive advantage to those firms and entrepreneurs who act boldly and imaginatively with diligent purpose and focus. An innovation is the implementation of a new or significantly-improved product, process, marketing approach, or organizational method. It requires careful analysis of the needs and capabilities of the intended users (Drucker, 1985). Innovations may be grouped in four ways:
- Product innovations are those introductions of new or significantly-improved goods or services, and may include significant improvements in technical specifications, components and materials, software, user friendliness, or other functional characteristics. Product innovations can be based on new uses or combinations of existing knowledge or technologies.
- Process innovations implement improved production or delivery methods, and include changes in techniques, equipment, and/or software.
- Marketing innovations involve changes in product design or packaging, promotion, or pricing. Such innovations are aimed at opening up new markets and/or new positioning of a firm's product to increase sales.
- Organizational innovations are new methods in a firm's business practices, workplace organization, or external relations. Such innovations are intended to increase a firm's performance by reducing transaction costs, gaining access to non-tradable assets, or reducing supply costs.
This innovation typology (product, process, marketing, and organizational) was compiled by Rajnish Tiwari (2008) of the Hamburg University of Technology and based on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) 2005 Oslo Manual on The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities.
It is important to note that innovation is increasingly a function of collaboration as pointed out in a 2008 Information Technology and Innovation Foundation report (Block & Keller, 2008). In today's world, collaboration is critical to private sector innovation. Such collaboration underscores the critical role of government agencies, federal labs, and research universities. Public agencies and institutions of higher learning can act as critical partners and/or catalysts in the innovation process. Innovation is fundamental to future economic productivity and community prosperity. Meaningful measures of collaboration on a regional level need to be developed. National indicators that measure innovations do not lend themselves to regional aggregation.
A Toronto newspaper declared "Innovate or Perish" in reporting on the recent release of a Canadian government report on the state of science, technology, and innovation in Canada (Campion-Smith, 2009). This succinctly sums up the pivotal position of innovation in the global knowledge economy. And innovation is indeed a global economic phenomenon. South Korea, for example, may be a relatively small country with limited natural assets but its leadership fully understands the innovation imperative. The Boston Consulting Group ranks South Korea first in its 2009 International Innovation Index (Andrew, DeRocco, & Taylor, 2009). The U.S. ranks eighth in the overall Index behind Finland, Hong Kong, Switzerland, among others, but second in the large-country ranking.
A community's capacity to nurture and support innovation is a key indicator of its competitive position in the global knowledge economy.
The indicators of Innovation Capacity include Patents, Venture Capital, and High-Tech Sector Performance.
Innovation Capacity: Patents
Patents provide a direct but imprecise measurement of innovation as many of the patents issued do not result in new business applications. Innovation in its economic context refers to business applications of new inventions, processes, and ideas.
Patents Issued (2007)
| Northeast MI1 | Northwest MI2 | Eastern UP3 | Michigan | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patents Issued | 5 | 41 | 2 | 3,695 |
| Per 1,000 population | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.37 |
The absence of a major research university or large private sector R&D facilities in the regions accounts, at least in part, for the lagging numbers of patents issued. Again, this is an imprecise measurement of innovation.
Innovation Capacity: Venture Capital
Venture capital provides private-sector funding for innovative company start-ups and product development. Venture capital investments represent high-risk, high-reward financial activities aimed at making profits when companies go public (IPOs, or initial public offerings) or are acquired. There are currently 882 venture capital firms in the U.S., down from 1,019 in 2007, according to the National Venture Capital Association (Tam, 2009).
In 2008, venture capitalists invested $244.0 million in Michigan firms and $1.4 billion in the Midwest (compared to $10.9 billion in Silicon Valley and $3.3 billion in New England). The Midwest includes Illinois, Missouri, Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Michigan, and western Pennsylvania in this report. For the first quarter of 2009, the level of investment in the Midwest dropped to $121.6 million from $228.8 million in the first quarter of 2008 (PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2009). There were no venture capital investments made in the three Northern Michigan regions in 2008, according to PricewaterhouseCoopers MoneyTree data.
In addition to funding, "management expertise provided by venture capitalists can assist the growth and development of small companies and new products and technologies," according to the National Science Foundation's Science and Engineering Indicators 2006 (National Science Board, 2006) report, "especially in the formation and expansion of small high-technology companies."
Venture Capital Firms (2008)
Data on the number of venture capital firms located in the respective regions is not one of the stronger indicators. For one, venture capital is one of several types of risk capital, that also include R&D, pre-seed, seed, and mezzanine capital. These types of capital can be delivered by universities and federal labs, pre-seed and seed funds, angel investors, venture funds, or mezzanine funds. Angel investors are particularly important in the earliest stages of a firm's development.
| Northeast MI1 | Northwest MI2 | Eastern UP3 | Michigan | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venture Capital Firms | 0 | 3 | 0 | 54 |
| Per 1,000 population | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
Limited access to capital represents one of the key barriers to economic development in rural regions. This table amply illustrates this difficulty.
Innovation Capacity: High-Tech Sector
The high-tech sector is at the core of the knowledge economy. The National Science Foundation relies on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005) definition of the high-technology sector. The sector "includes those science-based industries that manufacture products while performing above-average levels of R&D-aerospace, pharmaceuticals, computers and office machinery, communication equipment, and scientific (medical, precision, and optical) instruments." The high-tech sector frequently provides products and services used by other knowledge economy businesses. High-tech jobs are typically higher-paying, and often require college degrees or other types of formal training to assure that workers can apply advanced skills and knowledge to innovate new products, processes, and marketing approaches.
Defining the High-Tech Sector
Defining the scope of high-technology industries is challenging. To meet this challenge, extensive data from multiple sources was reviewed and evaluated: the 2008 State New Economy Index (Atkinson & Andes, 2008); 2007 Index of the Massachusetts Innovation Economy (Larkin, Tavilla, & Krispert, 2007); Information Technology in Minnesota: From Big Iron to Blue Gene and Xbox 360 (Fendos, 2008); Michigan's Transition to a Knowledge-Based Economy (Glazer & Grimes, 2008); and High-technology employment: a NAICS-based update (Hecker, 2005).
The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) was developed in 1997 and focuses on how products and services are created rather than on what is produced as the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) does. NAICS codes were revised in 2002 and 2007. (See two-digit NAICS codes.)
As a practical matter for purposes of this project, high-tech categories include computing services, telecommunications, research, a number of manufacturing industries, and the sciences. The following NAICS codes were identified as high-tech: 1131, 1132, 211, 2211, 324, 3251, 3252, 3253, 3254, 3255, 3259, 3332, 3333, 3336, 3339, 334, 3353, 3364, 3369, 4234, 486, 5112, 5152, 517, 518, 519, 521, 5232, 5413, 5415, 5416, 5417, 55, 5612, 8112, and federal government excluding postal services. Rates per 1,000 workers are based on the total employment in all NAICS sectors in each region.
The following three indicators are among the strongest performance indicators in the knowledge economy developed for this assessment. More time and resources were expended in developing this set of indicators than any other indicators in this assessment.
High-Tech Firms (2008)
| Northeast MI1 | Northwest MI2 | Eastern UP3 | Michigan | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-Tech Firms | 162 | 598 | 55 | 18,177 |
| Per 1,000 population | 1.17 | 2.01 | 0.98 | 1.82 |
Northwest Michigan exceeds the statewide level of high-tech firms per 1,000 population while Northeast Michigan and the Eastern Upper Peninsula lag significantly.
High-Tech Jobs (2008)
| Northeast MI1 | Northwest MI2 | Eastern UP3 | Michigan | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-Tech Jobs | 1,556 | 5,452 | 496 | 353,842 |
| Per 1,000 workers | 38.60 | 46.00 | 26.27 | 86.69 |
All three regions lag below the statewide level of high-tech jobs per 1,000 workers, with Northwest Michigan performing at a higher level than the other two regions.
Annual High-Tech Wages (2008)
| Northeast MI1 | Northwest MI2 | Eastern UP3 | Michigan | All Jobs (MI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual High-Tech Wage | $50,587 | $54,013 | $56,611 | $76,216 | $43,896 |
This indicator illustrates the high value of high-tech jobs with statewide high-tech wages exceeding all types of wages by over $32,000. Although regional high-tech wages are less than the statewide high-tech wages, they clearly provide a substantial living wage of over $50,000 per year in each region.
Definitions
- Northeast Michigan corresponds to the Northeast Michigan Council of Governments (NEMCOG) region of eight counties in the Lower Peninsula: Alcona, Alpena, Cheboygan, Crawford, Montmorency, Oscoda, Otsego, and Presque Isle.
- Northwest Michigan corresponds to the Northwest Michigan Council of Governments (NWMCOG) region of ten counties in the Lower Peninsula: Antrim, Benzie, Charlevoix, Emmet, Grand Traverse, Kalkaska, Leelanau, Manistee, Missaukee, and Wexford.
- The Eastern Upper Peninsula corresponds to the Eastern Upper Peninsula Regional Planning and Development Commission (EUPRPDC) region of three counties: Chippewa, Luce, and Mackinac.


